Posted: January 20th, 2023

Public policy to reduce recidivism rate among violent criminals without parole supervision Essay

Public policy to reduce recidivism rate among violent criminals without parole supervision Essay

Advocating for Public Policy

Student’s Name

Student’s Number

Course Number and Name

Due Date

 

Advocating for Public Policy

There are many different ways to reduce the recidivism rate among violent criminals without parole supervision. Some of these methods include effective rehabilitation programs, increased supervision and monitoring, and better education and job opportunities. One way is through effective rehabilitation programs. These programs provide offenders with the skills and knowledge needed to reintegrate into society and avoid criminal behavior. Rehabilitation programs can also help offenders develop positive relationships with law enforcement officers and community members, which can prevent them from returning to a life of crime.[1]. Another way to reduce the recidivism rate among violent criminals without parole supervision is through increased supervision and monitoring Public policy to reduce recidivism rate among violent criminals without parole supervision Essay. This approach involves increasing the number and intensity of checks that law enforcement officers routinely subject offenders to identify potential threats before they undertake the actual crimes.[2] By identifying and addressing potential problems early, law enforcement can help offenders rehabilitate and reintegrate into society.

BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Official Policy Actors Responsible to Reduce Recidivism Rate among Violent Criminals without Parole Supervision

Two main actors in public policy work to reduce the recidivism rate among violent criminals without parole supervision; the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) and the Board of Parole Hearings. The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) is responsible for the incarceration and rehabilitation of criminals in California state prisons.[3] CDCR oversees a number of programs designed to prevent and reduce the recidivism rate of violent offenders released from prison. One such program is the Correctional Reentry Initiative (CRI), which provides support and services to inmates before their release to society. The Board of Parole Hearings is responsible for reviewing applications for release from prison of violent criminals who have completed their sentence but still considered a threat to public safety.[4] The board may grant parole to the individual or deny the application based on a number of factors, including the severity of the crime and the risk that the offender will not abide by parole conditions.

Unofficial Policy Actors Responsible to Reduce Recidivism Rate among Violent Criminals without Parole Supervision

Two unofficial policy actors are important in public policy to reduce recidivism rates among violent criminals without parole supervision; the victim and the community. The victim has a voice often left unheard in the criminal justice system. Victim advocacy can play an important role in advocating for policies that reduce recidivism rates.[5] The community is also an important player in reducing recidivism rates. Public policy to reduce recidivism rate among violent criminals without parole supervision Essay They can play a role in supporting victim advocacy through offering services like mental health counseling and job training. They can also provide support to offenders through programs like gang intervention and re-entry assistance. They should not do the evil to revenge to those who have wronged them. Proverbs 3:31, says “Do not envy the violent or choose any of their ways.” By so doing, these two unofficial policy actors can play an important role in reducing recidivism rates among violent criminals without parole supervision.

Research Useful in Assessing Reduce Recidivism Rate among Violent Criminals without Parole Supervision

Different types of research can be useful in assessing public policy to reduce recidivism rates among violent criminals without parole supervision. Quantitative research can help identify specific trends and patterns in recidivism rates, while qualitative research can help assess how offenders and victims perceive the criminal justice system.[6] Additionally, survey research can measure public opinion on specific public policy options. Therefore, the type of research chosen depends on the specific question or issue to address.

 

 

Bibliography

Birkland, Thomas A. “An introduction to the Policy Process, Theories, Concepts, and Models of Public Policy Making.”  4th edition (2016).

Bonta, James, Guy Bourgon, Tanya Rugge, Chloe I. Pedneault, and Seung C. Lee. “A system-wide implementation and evaluation of the Strategic Training Initiative in Community Supervision (STICS).” Journal of Criminal Justice 74 (2021): 101816.

Caulkins, Jonathan P., Anne Gould, Bryce Pardo, Peter Reuter, and Bradley D. Stein. “Opioids and the criminal justice system: New challenges posed by the modern opioid epidemic.” Annual Review of Criminology 4 (2021): 353-375.

Latessa, Edward J., and Myrinda Schweitzer. “Community supervision and violent offenders: What the research tells us and how to improve outcomes.” Marq. L. Rev. 103 (2019): 911 Public policy to reduce recidivism rate among violent criminals without parole supervision Essay.

Nishi, Andrea. “Privatizing sentencing: A delegation framework for recidivism risk assessment.” Colum. L. Rev. 119 (2019): 1671.

 

[1] Latessa, Edward J., and Myrinda Schweitzer. “Community supervision and violent offenders: What the research tells us and how to improve outcomes.” Marq. L. Rev. 103 (2019): 911.

911. 103 (2019): 911.

[2] Bonta, James, Guy Bourgon, Tanya Rugge, Chloe I. Pedneault, and Seung C. Lee. “A system-wide implementation and evaluation of the Strategic Training Initiative in Community Supervision (STICS).” Journal of Criminal Justice 74 (2021): 101816.

 

 

[3] Nishi, Andrea. “Privatizing sentencing: A delegation framework for recidivism risk assessment.” Colum. L. Rev. 119 (2019): 1671.

 

[4] Ibid, p.1671

[5] Birkland, Thomas A. “An introduction to the Policy Process, Theories, Concepts, and Models of Public Policy Making.”  4th edition (2016).

 

[6] Caulkins, Jonathan P., Anne Gould, Bryce Pardo, Peter Reuter, and Bradley D. Stein. “Opioids and the criminal justice system: New challenges posed by the modern opioid epidemic.” Annual Review of Criminology 4 (2021): 353-375 Public policy to reduce recidivism rate among violent criminals without parole supervision Essay.

 

 

 

 

Public Policy Actors

             Advocating for Public Policy

 

 

Read: Thomas A. Birkland: An introduction to the Policy Process, Theories, Concepts, and Models of Public Policy Making.  4^th edition, published 2016

Chapter 4

Chapter 5

Chapter 6

 

 

• Identify one or more official policy actor(s) most responsible for the public policy issue that you are exploring and assess their role(s) in evaluating/implementing/blocking this public policy issue. Be specific.

 

• Identify one or more unofficial policy actor(s) most responsible for the public policy issue that you are exploring and assess their role(s) in evaluating/implementing/blocking this public policy issue. Be specific.

 

• Consider what kind of research may be useful in assessing your current policy or issue and tailoring it to the relevant actor or audience. (For example, is there a lack of current or relevant data on this issue? Are there externalities that have not been fully understood? Are there new academic perspectives that have not been taken into account in the policy process?) Public policy to reduce recidivism rate among violent criminals without parole supervision Essay