Posted: July 13th, 2016

There are some inaccuracies describing the literature review. The literature review elements are discussed and support the purpose of the study.

literature review elements

literature review elements – Rubric Part 1 1 Unsatisfactory 0%-71% 71.00% 2 Less Than Satisfactory 72%-75% 75.00% 3 Satisfactory 76%-83% 79.00% 4 Good 84%-89% 89.00% 5 Excellent 90% – 100% 100.00% 80.0 %Content 20.0 %Research problem and purpose Does not mention research problem or purpose of study. There are some inaccuracies in describing the research problem. The research problem and purpose are present and mostly accurate.

The research problem and purpose are described with reference to nursing. The problem and purpose of the study are clearly articulated, and their importance to nursing addressed. 20.0 %Research objective, questions or hypotheses Does not mention objections, research question (s) or hypotheses. There are some inaccuracies describing the research objective, questions or hypotheses.

The research objective, questions or hypotheses are present and mostly accurate. The research objective, question or hypotheses are described and related to study methods. Research question is clearly and accurately described and is congruent with research purpose, method, and worldview of researcher. 20.0 %Literature Review Does not mention literature review. There are some inaccuracies describing the literature review. literature review elements 

The literature review elements are discussed and support the purpose of the study. The literature review and how it supports the purpose of the study are described. The literature review critique is thorough and clear, and supports the purpose and research question. 20.0 %Frame of Reference (qualitative) Does not mention frame of reference There are some inaccuracies describing frame of reference.

The frame of reference elements are present and mostly accurate. The frame of reference is described. The frame of reference is thorough, clear, and accurately described using research terminology. 15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.

Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. 5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence.

apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions.

Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless. 

literature review elements