Posted: February 7th, 2021
In the article by Vaz, Volkert, and Piazza (2011) from this unit’s studies, an intervention was applied to address the negative reinforcement function of food refusal by a young boy.For this assignment:Describe your initial reaction to the intervention, especially regarding the use of escape avoidance strategies.
Take the position that you oppose the intervention and explain why. Your rationale should specifically address any possible undesired side effects, as well as whether the intervention appeared to violate any ethical codes. Be sure to cite specific codes from the Professional and Ethical Compliance Code for Behavior Analysts.Take the position that you support the intervention and explain why. Your rationale should specifically address any possible benefits and the boy’s right to effective treatment.Revisit your initial reaction to the intervention.
Do you still feel the same way, or has your examination of both sides influenced your reaction? Do you believe the intervention is in line with the Professional and Ethical Compliance Code for Behavior Analysts? Explain.Reference your unit readings, professional codes of conduct, and other resources to support your positions.Assignment RequirementsWritten communication: Should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.APA formatting: References and citations are formatted according to current APA style guidelines.Resources:
A sufficient number of scholarly or professional resources.Length: 2 double-spaced pages, in addition to a title page and references page.Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12-point.SafeAssign: You are required to use SafeAssign before submitting the completed assignment to your instructor. Submit your work to SafeAssign as a draft, review the results, and make any needed changes. When you are ready, submit your assignment to the assignment area for grading.
Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.